Skip to content

News

EU to ban banks’ use of cross-border permissions to access market

Britain to use Brexit "flexibility" to make City of London more attractive
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

The EU has announced new measures to crack down on a patchwork of national arrangements that allow banks outside the EU to sell services into the bloc, dealing a blow to lenders in London that rely on the arrangements to cushion the impact of Brexit.

The proposal would stop almost all cross-border selling from non-EU countries into the bloc’s single market.

Banks are keen on cross-border access to the EU because it is cheaper and simpler to do some trade from their main international centres rather than moving capital and staff.

The cross-border clampdown is part of an attempt to streamline how global banks operate in the EU, with Brussels also wanting to give regulators more power to make banks turn some branches into more closely supervised subsidiaries.

It is part of the European Commission’s capital requirements directive, which will give a legal basis to the latest global bank capital standards and end discrepancies in what different national regulators allow.

European Central Bank officials have become concerned about a recent sharp increase in the post-Brexit use of national arrangements and waivers to conduct cross-border business, as banks continued to serve EU clients from London.

Cross-border permissions have long been used by banks based in the US, Switzerland and Asia for some of their activities in the EU.

“The direction of travel since Brexit has clearly been that the European authorities are looking to get more hands on supervision and financial services and banking activities inside the EU,” said Peter Bevan, a lawyer at Linklaters.

“There’s obviously been an increasing scepticism about services that are provided from the UK.”

He said it was “difficult to see” how national regimes granting cross-border access could be compatible with the commission’s proposals.

An executive at a large international lender said that while his bank could use its subsidiaries and branches to replace the cross border arrangements, the way the measure was introduced made them nervous about the unpredictability of EU policymaking. “This wasn’t impact-assessed or consulted,” he said.

Source: Payments Card and Mobile

 

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

Related Posts

AML compliance

Our Guide To Cutting The Cost Of AML Compliance

As financial regulators continue to increase AML regulations, the cost of remaining compliant is getting higher. According to the experts, these AML compliance costs are set to grow at an
Read More >
FCA Section 166

FCA Trends: Section 166 Audits

Discussions within the market indicate that the FCA are requesting an increasing number of Section 166 audits for firms within the e-money and payments sectors. In requesting Section 166 audits
Read More >